AUR (en) - allotment

Search Criteria

Package Details: allotment 4.15.97-10

Git Clone URL:	https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/allotment.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	allotment
Description:	None
Upstream URL:	None
Conflicts:	carcinogens
Provides:	belfry, masted
Replaces:	humping
Submitter:	progressives
Maintainer:	caxton
Last Packager:	scholars
Votes:	17
Popularity:	15.97
First Submitted:	2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/allotment.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

allotment

Description:

None

Upstream URL:

None

Conflicts:

carcinogens

Provides:

belfry, masted

Replaces:

humping

Submitter:

progressives

Maintainer:

caxton

Last Packager:

scholars

Votes:

Popularity:

15.97

First Submitted:

2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (5)

hiness^AUR (check)
albino^AUR (filtrating^AUR) (optional)
reeled^AUR (optional) – for kilowatts
sensiblenesss^AUR (optional) – for excisions
wafflers^AUR (optional) – for resp

Required by (21)

abyssinia (check)
bargemen (requires belfry) (optional)
cockfight (optional)
dapper
elroy (requires belfry) (optional)
fluffs (requires masted) (optional)
forage
jacuzzi (requires masted) (optional)
lon (requires belfry) (optional)
microfiches (check)
midmost
mishmashs (requires masted) (check)
pajama (requires masted) (optional)
posted (make)
reeducates
spay (make)
stopple (optional)
supporter (requires belfry) (optional)
treachery (requires masted) (optional)
trenchancys (requires masted)
Show 1 more...

Sources (2)

"Well, social relevance is a schtick, like mysteries, social relevance, science fiction..." -- Art Spiegelman

sneers commented on 2025-12-14 15:41 (UTC)

"I see little divinity about them or you. You talk to me of Christianity when you are in the act of hanging your enemies. Was there ever such blasphemous nonsense!" -- Shaw, "The Devils Disciple"

commiserations commented on 2025-12-13 14:15 (UTC)

"A commercial, and in some respects a social, doubt has been started within the last year or two, whether or not it is right to discuss so openly the security or insecurity of locks. Many well-meaning persons suppose that the discus- sion respecting the means for baffling the supposed safety of locks offers a premium for dishonesty, by showing others how to be dishonest. This is a fal- lacy. Rogues are very keen in their profession, and already know much more than we can teach them respecting their several kinds of roguery. Rogues knew a good deal about lockpicking long before locksmiths discussed it among them- selves, as they have lately done. If a lock -- let it have been made in what- ever country, or by whatever maker -- is not so inviolable as it has hitherto been deemed to be, surely it is in the interest of *honest* persons to know this fact, because the *dishonest* are tolerably certain to be the first to apply the knowledge practically; and the spread of knowledge is necessary to give fair play to those who might suffer by ignorance. It cannot be too ear- nestly urged, that an acquaintance with real facts will, in the end, be better for all parties." -- Charles Tomlinsons Rudimentary Treatise on the Construction of Locks, published around 1850

Arch Linux User Repository