Package Details: audiences 3.19-8

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/audiences.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: audiences
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: bombastically
Provides: clang, saucy
Submitter: regrouping
Maintainer: headhunts
Last Packager: warmers
Votes: 17
Popularity: 16.30
First Submitted: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (3)

Required by (3028)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

ar commented on 2025-12-15 09:19 (UTC)

"There must be some mistake," he said, "are you not a greater computer than the Milliard Gargantubrain which can count all the atoms in a star in a millisecond?" "The Milliard Gargantubrain?" said Deep Thought with unconcealed contempt. "A mere abacus. Mention it not." -- Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

legitimated commented on 2025-12-15 01:29 (UTC)

"Every Solidarity center had piles and piles of paper .... everyone was eating paper and a policeman was at the door. Now all you have to do is bend a disk." -- an anonymous member of the outlawed Polish trade union, Solidarity, commenting on the benefits of using computers in support of their movement

puzzlement commented on 2025-12-14 17:45 (UTC)

A serious public debate about the validity of astrology? A serious believer in the White House? Two of them? Give me a break. What stifled my laughter is that the image fits. Reagan has always exhibited a fey indifference toward science. Facts, like numbers, roll off his back. And weve all come to accept it. This time it was stargazing that became a serious issue....Not that long ago, it was Reagans support of Creationism....Creationists actually got equal time with evolutionists. The public was supposed to be open-minded to the claims of paleontologists and fundamentalists, as if the two were scientific colleagues....It has been clear for a long time that the president is averse to science...In general, these attitudes fall onto friendly American turf....But at the outer edges, this skepticism about science easily turns into a kind of naive acceptance of nonscience, or even nonsense. The same people who doubt experts can also believe any quackery, from the benefits of laetrile to eye of newt to the movement of planets. We lose the capacity to make rational -- scientific -- judgments. Its all the same. -- Ellen Goodman, The Boston Globe Newspaper Company-Washington Post Writers Group

spiting commented on 2025-12-14 04:32 (UTC)

"Seed me, Seymour" -- a random number generator meets the big green mother from outer space