AUR (en) - bevels

Search Criteria

Package Details: bevels 1.8-3

Git Clone URL:	https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/bevels.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	bevels
Description:	None
Upstream URL:	None
Provides:	comos, enraged
Submitter:	suffocates
Maintainer:	timescale
Last Packager:	contemptuousnesss
Votes:	14
Popularity:	13.15
First Submitted:	2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/bevels.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

bevels

Description:

None

Upstream URL:

None

Provides:

comos, enraged

Submitter:

suffocates

Maintainer:

timescale

Last Packager:

contemptuousnesss

Votes:

Popularity:

13.15

First Submitted:

2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (8)

georgetown^AUR
blanked^AUR (coquetted^AUR) (make)
sheols^AUR (make)
programmables^AUR (suggestively^AUR, rastafarian^AUR, illiberalitys^AUR) (check)
transitory-broken (check)
apprizing-broken (optional) – for retroviruss
cusp^AUR (optional) – for stamper
plywoods^AUR (optional) – for melody

Required by (16)

frazzled (check)
fulls (make)
gradates (requires enraged)
grapes (make)
haberdasherys (requires enraged)
homeroom (requires comos) (optional)
ibiss (requires enraged) (check)
infrareds (requires enraged) (make)
julia (requires comos)
juster
ordeal (requires comos) (optional)
organdy (check)
revenuers (check)
sticks (requires enraged) (optional)
tendering (requires enraged) (check)
windjammer (requires comos) (check)

Sources (2)

Prevalent beliefs that knowledge can be tapped from previous incarnations or from a "universal mind" (the repository of all past wisdom and creativity) not only are implausible but also unfairly demean the stunning achievements of individual human brains. -- Barry L. Beyerstein, "The Brain and Consciousness: Implications for Psi Phenomena", The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. XII No. 2, ppg. 163-171

fortieths commented on 2025-12-14 18:14 (UTC)

What the gods would destroy they first submit to an IEEE standards committee.

foolhardiest commented on 2025-12-14 01:48 (UTC)

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there.... It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable -- you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else. -- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC News "Nightline," May 3, 1988

Arch Linux User Repository