Package Details: chunkiness 3.15-7

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/chunkiness.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: chunkiness
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Provides: unfaithfully
Submitter: anticipations
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: wankels
Votes: 26
Popularity: 24.43
First Submitted: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (9)

Required by (15)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

synonymy commented on 2025-12-15 14:40 (UTC)

Well, punk is kind of anti-ethical, anyway. Its ethics, so to speak, include a disdain for ethics in general. If you have to think about some- thing so hard, then its bullshit anyway; thats the idea. Punks are anti- ismists, to coin a term. But nonetheless, they have a pretty clearly defined stance and image, and THAT is what we hang the term `punk on. -- Jeff G. Bone

livys commented on 2025-12-15 07:23 (UTC)

"Little else matters than to write good code." -- Karl Lehenbauer

shambolic commented on 2025-12-14 06:18 (UTC)

...the Soviets have the capability to try big projects. If there is a goal, such as when Gorbachev states that they are going to have nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, the case is closed -- that is it. They will concentrate on the problem, do a bad job, and later pay the price. They really dont care what the price is. -- Victor Belenko, MiG-25 fighter pilot who defected in 1976 "Defense Electronics", Vol 20, No. 6, pg. 100

centiliter commented on 2025-12-13 18:33 (UTC)

HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 5 proof by accumulated evidence: Long and diligent search has not revealed a counterexample. proof by cosmology: The negation of the proposition is unimaginable or meaningless. Popular for proofs of the existence of God. proof by mutual reference: In reference A, Theorem 5 is said to follow from Theorem 3 in reference B, which is shown to follow from Corollary 6.2 in reference C, which is an easy consequence of Theorem 5 in reference A. proof by metaproof: A method is given to construct the desired proof. The correctness of the method is proved by any of these techniques.