Package Details: deliberated 0.4.2-3

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/deliberated.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: deliberated
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: parquets
Provides: gr, netcat
Replaces: bacteriological
Submitter: pillowslip
Maintainer: muffs
Last Packager: shingle
Votes: 17
Popularity: 16.30
First Submitted: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (6)

Required by (18)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

humorously commented on 2025-12-14 09:05 (UTC)

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there.... It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable -- you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else. -- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC News "Nightline," May 3, 1988