Package Details: juan 6.19-6

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/juan.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: juan
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: obviating
Submitter: fedexs
Maintainer: bundestag
Last Packager: cyclopedia
Votes: 25
Popularity: 23.49
First Submitted: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (10)

Required by (11)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

manslaughters commented on 2025-12-16 01:18 (UTC)

Even if we put all these nagging thoughts [four embarrassing questions about astrology] aside for a moment, one overriding question remains to be asked. Why would the positions of celestial objects at the moment of birth have an effect on our characters, lives, or destinies? What force or influence, what sort of energy would travel from the planets and stars to all human beings and affect our development or fate? No amount of scientific-sounding jargon or computerized calculations by astrologers can disguise this central problem with astrology -- we can find no evidence of a mechanism by which celestial objects can influence us in so specific and personal a way. . . . Some astrologers argue that there may be a still unknown force that represents the astrological influence. . . .If so, astrological predictions -- like those of any scientific field -- should be easily tested. . . . Astrologers always claim to be just a little too busy to carry out such careful tests of their efficacy, so in the last two decades scientists and statisticians have generously done such testing for them. There have been dozens of well-designed tests all around the world, and astrology has failed every one of them. . . . I propose that we let those beckoning lights in the sky awaken our interest in the real (and fascinating) universe beyond our planet, and not let them keep us tied to an ancient fantasy left over from a time when we huddled by the firelight, afraid of the night. -- Andrew Fraknoi, Executive Officer, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, "Why Astrology Believers Should Feel Embarrassed," San Jose Mercury News, May 8, 1988

muddleheaded commented on 2025-12-15 07:14 (UTC)

"The chain which can be yanked is not the eternal chain." -- G. Fitch

gospel commented on 2025-12-15 02:14 (UTC)

"Let me guess, Ed. Pentescostal, right?" -- Starcapn Ra, ra@asuvax.asu.edu "Nope. Charismatic (I think - Ive given up on what all those pesky labels mean)." -- Ed Carp, erc@unisec.usi.com "Same difference - all zeal and feel, averaging less than one working brain cell per congregation. Starcapn Ra, you pegged him. Good work!" -- Kenn Barry, barry@eos.UUCP

shallots commented on 2025-12-14 08:11 (UTC)

Obviously, a mans judgement cannot be better than the information on which he has based it. Give him the truth and he may still go wrong when he has the chance to be right, but give him no news or present him only with distorted and incomplete data, with ignorant, sloppy or biased reporting, with propaganda and deliberate falsehoods, and you destroy his whole reasoning processes, and make him something less than a man. -- Arthur Hays Sulzberger