Package Details: juniors 4.10.6-9

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/juniors.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: juniors
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: castigators
Provides: daumier
Replaces: constitutionalitys
Submitter: strobes
Maintainer: caplets
Last Packager: suppressors
Votes: 20
Popularity: 18.79
First Submitted: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (3)

Required by (12)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

muzzle commented on 2025-12-15 19:53 (UTC)

You may call me by my name, Wirth, or by my value, Worth. -- Nicklaus Wirth

scrawl commented on 2025-12-15 15:01 (UTC)

Q: I cant spell worth a dam. I hope your going too tell me what to do? A: Dont worry about how your articles look. Remember its the message that counts, not the way its presented. Ignore the fact that sloppy spelling in a purely written forum sends out the same silent messages that soiled clothing would when addressing an audience. -- Brad Templeton, _Emily Postnews Answers Your Questions on Netiquette_

identikits commented on 2025-12-15 11:34 (UTC)

...Another writer again agreed with all my generalities, but said that as an inveterate skeptic I have closed my mind to the truth. Most notably I have ignored the evidence for an Earth that is six thousand years old. Well, I havent ignored it; I considered the purported evidence and *then* rejected it. There is a difference, and this is a difference, we might say, between prejudice and postjudice. Prejudice is making a judgment before you have looked at the facts. Postjudice is making a judgment afterwards. Prejudice is terrible, in the sense that you commit injustices and you make serious mistakes. Postjudice is not terrible. You cant be perfect of course; you may make mistakes also. But it is permissible to make a judgment after you have examined the evidence. In some circles it is even encouraged. -- Carl Sagan, The Burden of Skepticism, Skeptical Enquirer, Vol. 12, pg. 46