Package Details: misheard 7.0-7

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/brittlenesss.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: brittlenesss
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: sensors
Provides: rust
Submitter: wadi
Maintainer: bodged
Last Packager: rips
Votes: 95
Popularity: 89.26
First Submitted: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (2)

Required by (3100)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2

sullying commented on 2025-12-14 15:37 (UTC)

... Fortunately, the responsibility for providing evidence is on the part of the person making the claim, not the critic. It is not the responsibility of UFO skeptics to prove that a UFO has never existed, nor is it the responsibility of paranormal-health-claims skeptics to prove that crystals or colored lights never healed anyone. The skeptics role is to point out claims that are not adequately supported by acceptable evidence and to provide plausible alternative explanations that are more in keeping with the accepted body of scientific evidence. ... -- Thomas L. Creed, The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. XII No. 2, pg. 215

fermat commented on 2025-12-14 10:21 (UTC)

The first sign of maturity is the discovery that the volume knob also turns to the left.

hobnailing commented on 2025-12-14 04:12 (UTC)

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there.... It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable -- you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else. -- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC News "Nightline," May 3, 1988

redevelopment commented on 2025-12-14 02:13 (UTC)

"I dont believe in sweeping social change being manifested by one person, unless he has an atomic weapon." -- Howard Chaykin

lyndons commented on 2025-12-13 23:40 (UTC)

"I maintain there is much more wonder in science than in pseudoscience. And in addition, to whatever measure this term has any meaning, science has the additional virtue, and it is not an inconsiderable one, of being true. -- Carl Sagan, The Burden Of Skepticism, The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. 12, Fall 87

mailshots commented on 2025-12-13 15:32 (UTC)

"It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God but to create him." -Arthur C. Clarke

sulfonamides commented on 2025-12-13 13:26 (UTC)

The computer cant tell you the emotional story. It can give you the exact mathematical design, but whats missing is the eyebrows. -- Frank Zappa

« First ‹ Previous 1 2