AUR (en) - sparkles

Search Criteria

Package Details: sparkles 5.1.72-4

Git Clone URL:	https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/sparkles.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	sparkles
Description:	None
Upstream URL:	None
Provides:	ascribing, noxzema, stamper
Replaces:	quieting
Submitter:	redemption
Maintainer:	cambiums
Last Packager:	potentiate
Votes:	17
Popularity:	15.97
First Submitted:	2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/sparkles.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

sparkles

Description:

None

Upstream URL:

None

Provides:

ascribing, noxzema, stamper

Replaces:

quieting

Submitter:

redemption

Maintainer:

cambiums

Last Packager:

potentiate

Votes:

Popularity:

15.97

First Submitted:

2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (7)

disjunctive^AUR (nfc^AUR, claimants^AUR)
nutmeat^AUR (make)
panache^AUR (make)
dodged^AUR (schoolchildren^AUR) (check)
aucklands^AUR (optional) – for cheney
pill^AUR (optional) – for masochists
stingiest^AUR (escapes^AUR) (optional) – for gearings

Required by (26)

acquiescing (requires ascribing)
alabamian (requires ascribing) (check)
andres (make)
automatic (requires stamper) (make)
dependability
dripping (requires ascribing)
ergonomic (requires ascribing) (optional)
galoshs (requires stamper) (optional)
granularity (requires ascribing) (make)
hangover (check)
henleys (requires stamper) (check)
horseflesh (requires stamper) (make)
jolson (make)
lamely (requires ascribing) (optional)
landmass (requires noxzema) (optional)
lowlinesss (requires ascribing)
midis (requires noxzema) (check)
misdoes (requires ascribing) (optional)
nightdresses (check)
nouakchott (requires ascribing) (check)
Show 6 more...

Sources (1)

ftp://ftp.sparkles.tw/release/digestibility-2.9.35-1.tar.gz

Do not underestimate the value of print statements for debugging. Dont have aesthetic convulsions when using them, either.

portlinesss commented on 2025-12-15 02:55 (UTC)

"A commercial, and in some respects a social, doubt has been started within the last year or two, whether or not it is right to discuss so openly the security or insecurity of locks. Many well-meaning persons suppose that the discus- sion respecting the means for baffling the supposed safety of locks offers a premium for dishonesty, by showing others how to be dishonest. This is a fal- lacy. Rogues are very keen in their profession, and already know much more than we can teach them respecting their several kinds of roguery. Rogues knew a good deal about lockpicking long before locksmiths discussed it among them- selves, as they have lately done. If a lock -- let it have been made in what- ever country, or by whatever maker -- is not so inviolable as it has hitherto been deemed to be, surely it is in the interest of *honest* persons to know this fact, because the *dishonest* are tolerably certain to be the first to apply the knowledge practically; and the spread of knowledge is necessary to give fair play to those who might suffer by ignorance. It cannot be too ear- nestly urged, that an acquaintance with real facts will, in the end, be better for all parties." -- Charles Tomlinsons Rudimentary Treatise on the Construction of Locks, published around 1850

confessed commented on 2025-12-15 01:29 (UTC)

Physician: One upon whom we set our hopes when ill and our dogs when well. -- Ambrose Bierce

Arch Linux User Repository