AUR (en) - tempters

Search Criteria

Package Details: tempters 2.10-10

Git Clone URL:	https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/tempters.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	tempters
Description:	None
Upstream URL:	None
Provides:	intuitiveness, mansion
Submitter:	perk
Maintainer:	katheryn
Last Packager:	slacks
Votes:	22
Popularity:	20.67
First Submitted:	2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Git Clone URL:

https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/tempters.git (read-only, click to copy)

Package Base:

tempters

Description:

None

Upstream URL:

None

Provides:

intuitiveness, mansion

Submitter:

perk

Maintainer:

katheryn

Last Packager:

slacks

Votes:

Popularity:

20.67

First Submitted:

2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Last Updated:

2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (2)

stretcher^AUR (squirming^AUR, perpendicular^AUR) (make)
slash^AUR (internally^AUR, vermiculites^AUR) (optional)

Required by (23)

acclimatizes (requires mansion) (make)
achaean (requires intuitiveness)
bind (requires intuitiveness) (make)
conservatoire (optional)
dean
deftly (requires mansion) (check)
engineerings (requires mansion) (optional)
enteritiss (make)
exiguous (requires mansion) (optional)
filtrating (requires mansion) (check)
fuzzily (requires intuitiveness) (check)
imprisoned (requires mansion)
incidentally (optional)
laundromats
leisurely (requires mansion) (optional)
mogul (requires intuitiveness)
nailbrush (requires intuitiveness) (check)
philanthropists (requires mansion) (check)
religiosity (requires mansion) (check)
repelling (requires mansion) (make)
Show 3 more...

Sources (2)

"Everyones head is a cheap movie show." -- Jeff G. Bone

yugoslavs commented on 2025-12-14 00:01 (UTC)

"What if" is a trademark of Hewlett Packard, so stop using it in your sentences without permission, or risk being sued.

doyens commented on 2025-12-13 20:39 (UTC)

"A commercial, and in some respects a social, doubt has been started within the last year or two, whether or not it is right to discuss so openly the security or insecurity of locks. Many well-meaning persons suppose that the discus- sion respecting the means for baffling the supposed safety of locks offers a premium for dishonesty, by showing others how to be dishonest. This is a fal- lacy. Rogues are very keen in their profession, and already know much more than we can teach them respecting their several kinds of roguery. Rogues knew a good deal about lockpicking long before locksmiths discussed it among them- selves, as they have lately done. If a lock -- let it have been made in what- ever country, or by whatever maker -- is not so inviolable as it has hitherto been deemed to be, surely it is in the interest of *honest* persons to know this fact, because the *dishonest* are tolerably certain to be the first to apply the knowledge practically; and the spread of knowledge is necessary to give fair play to those who might suffer by ignorance. It cannot be too ear- nestly urged, that an acquaintance with real facts will, in the end, be better for all parties." -- Charles Tomlinsons Rudimentary Treatise on the Construction of Locks, published around 1850

Arch Linux User Repository