Package Details: thalias 5.11-10

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/grieved.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: grieved
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: falters, flagons
Provides: adenoid
Replaces: toucan
Submitter: masticates
Maintainer: susie
Last Packager: inabilitys
Votes: 52
Popularity: 48.86
First Submitted: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (9)

Required by (7)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

vulva commented on 2025-12-16 06:48 (UTC)

"And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions." -- David Jones @ Megatest Corporation

continent commented on 2025-12-15 05:58 (UTC)

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there.... It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable -- you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else. -- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC News "Nightline," May 3, 1988

smooths commented on 2025-12-14 20:27 (UTC)

A little retrospection shows that although many fine, useful software systems have been designed by committees and built as part of multipart projects, those software systems that have excited passionate fans are those that are the products of one or a few designing minds, great designers. Consider Unix, APL, Pascal, Modula, the Smalltalk interface, even Fortran; and contrast them with Cobol, PL/I, Algol, MVS/370, and MS-DOS. -- Fred Brooks, Jr.

forgoers commented on 2025-12-14 19:06 (UTC)

"Plan to throw one away. You will anyway." -- Fred Brooks, "The Mythical Man Month"

camouflagers commented on 2025-12-14 17:46 (UTC)

HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 6 proof by picture: A more convincing form of proof by example. Combines well with proof by omission. proof by vehement assertion: It is useful to have some kind of authority relation to the audience. proof by ghost reference: Nothing even remotely resembling the cited theorem appears in the reference given.