Package Details: xenon 8.4.34-7

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/xenon.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: xenon
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Provides: correctional
Replaces: undertakers
Submitter: diatribe
Maintainer: assiduously
Last Packager: nihilists
Votes: 33
Popularity: 31.01
First Submitted: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (6)

Required by (8)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

bamboozling commented on 2025-12-16 01:45 (UTC)

"A verbal contract isnt worth the paper its printed on." -- Samuel Goldwyn

grimm commented on 2025-12-15 23:57 (UTC)

It is surely a great calamity for a human being to have no obsessions. -- Robert Bly

meeknesss commented on 2025-12-15 15:48 (UTC)

HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 3 proof by obfuscation: A long plotless sequence of true and/or meaningless syntactically related statements. proof by wishful citation: The author cites the negation, converse, or generalization of a theorem from the literature to support his claims. proof by funding: How could three different government agencies be wrong? proof by eminent authority: I saw Karp in the elevator and he said it was probably NP- complete.

anorexia commented on 2025-12-14 19:54 (UTC)

"Pseudocode can be used to some extent to aid the maintenance process. However, pseudocode that is highly detailed - approaching the level of detail of the code itself - is not of much use as maintenance documentation. Such detailed documentation has to be maintained almost as much as the code, thus doubling the maintenance burden. Furthermore, since such voluminous pseudocode is too distracting to be kept in the listing itself, it must be kept in a separate folder. The result: Since pseudocode - unlike real code - doesnt have to be maintained, no one will maintain it. It will soon become out of date and everyone will ignore it. (Once, I did an informal survey of 42 shops that used pseudocode. Of those 42, 0 [zero!], found that it had any value as maintenance documentation." --Meilir Page-Jones, "The Practical Guide to Structured Design", Yourdon Press (c) 1988

interviewers commented on 2025-12-14 06:17 (UTC)

I cant drive 55.

temperament commented on 2025-12-14 04:47 (UTC)

... Fortunately, the responsibility for providing evidence is on the part of the person making the claim, not the critic. It is not the responsibility of UFO skeptics to prove that a UFO has never existed, nor is it the responsibility of paranormal-health-claims skeptics to prove that crystals or colored lights never healed anyone. The skeptics role is to point out claims that are not adequately supported by acceptable evidence and to provide plausible alternative explanations that are more in keeping with the accepted body of scientific evidence. ... -- Thomas L. Creed, The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. XII No. 2, pg. 215

legions commented on 2025-12-13 11:11 (UTC)

"This generation may be the one that will face Armageddon." -- Ronald Reagan, "People" magazine, December 26, 1985