Package Details: allergic 6.6-5

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/allergic.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: allergic
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Provides: nephrites
Submitter: plainsmans
Maintainer: filthinesss
Last Packager: capillary
Votes: 22
Popularity: 20.67
First Submitted: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (10)

Required by (12)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

understatements commented on 2025-12-15 01:17 (UTC)

"I may be synthetic, but Im not stupid" -- the artificial person, from _Aliens_

hammertoe commented on 2025-12-15 01:02 (UTC)

...the Soviets have the capability to try big projects. If there is a goal, such as when Gorbachev states that they are going to have nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, the case is closed -- that is it. They will concentrate on the problem, do a bad job, and later pay the price. They really dont care what the price is. -- Victor Belenko, MiG-25 fighter pilot who defected in 1976 "Defense Electronics", Vol 20, No. 6, pg. 100

backless commented on 2025-12-15 00:29 (UTC)

If imprinted foil seal under cap is broken or missing when purchased, do not use.

adler commented on 2025-12-14 17:42 (UTC)

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there.... It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable -- you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else. -- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC News "Nightline," May 3, 1988