Package Details: difficult 0.7-8

Git Clone URL: https://aurweb-goaurrpc-uat.sandbox.archlinux.page/difficult.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: difficult
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: barnstormer, refutable
Provides: creeping
Replaces: debauchery
Submitter: composting
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: illustrators
Votes: 12
Popularity: 11.27
First Submitted: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-12-13 10:40 (UTC)

Dependencies (6)

Required by (14)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

crossness commented on 2025-12-15 06:39 (UTC)

HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 1 proof by example: The author gives only the case n = 2 and suggests that it contains most of the ideas of the general proof. proof by intimidation: Trivial. proof by vigorous handwaving: Works well in a classroom or seminar setting.

aquifers commented on 2025-12-14 12:32 (UTC)

The only way to learn a new programming language is by writing programs in it. -- Brian Kernighan

admin commented on 2025-12-14 08:02 (UTC)

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there.... It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable -- you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else. -- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC News "Nightline," May 3, 1988

inventory commented on 2025-12-13 19:18 (UTC)

"Truth never comes into the world but like a bastard, to the ignominy of him that brought her birth." -- Milton